What is international reaction for Trump Statement for taking over Gaza
Introduction
President Donald Trump’s proposal for the U.S. to “take over” Gaza and resettle Palestinians elsewhere has drawn widespread international condemnation, with reactions spanning from key allies to adversaries. Here’s a breakdown of the global response:
Immediate Rejection by Arab Nations
Saudi Arabia reiterated its “firm, steadfast, and unwavering position” supporting Palestinian statehood, rejecting any plan that displaces Palestinians or undermines their land claims.
Egypt and Jordan firmly opposed relocating Gaza’s population to their territories, emphasizing the need for Gazans to remain in their homeland.
Hamas and the Palestinian Authority both condemned the proposal. Hamas called it a “recipe for chaos” and vowed resistance, while President Mahmoud Abbas labeled it a “serious violation of international law” and affirmed Gaza as part of a future Palestinian state.
European and Western Allies
France
Opposed forced displacement, calling it a breach of international law and a barrier to a two-state solution.
Germany
Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock stressed that displacement would fuel suffering and hatred, reaffirming support for a negotiated two-state solution.
UK
Environment Minister Steve Reed emphasized Palestinians’ right to return home, stating, “The last… months have been a living nightmare”.
Australia
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reiterated commitment to a two-state solution, though avoided direct criticism of Trump.
Global Powers and International Law
China and Russia joined calls for a two-state solution, aligning with broader UN and G7 positions.
UN and Arab League
Palestinian leaders urged emergency sessions to address what they called a U.S. attempt to impose “guardianship” over Gaza.
Domestic U.S. Criticism
Democratic Senator Chris Coons described the plan as “offensive, insane, and dangerous”, while Representative Rashida Tlaib accused Trump of “openly calling for ethnic cleansing”.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) warned forced displacement would constitute a “crime against humanity”.
Israeli Support
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump’s “fresh ideas,” calling the proposal historic and aligned with Israel’s goal to neutralize Hamas.
However, Netanyahu’s political rival Benny Gantz framed it as evidence of U.S.-Israel ties rather than explicit endorsement.
Legal and Humanitarian Concerns
Multiple nations highlighted violations of international law, particularly prohibitions on forced population transfers.
Analysts warned the plan risked destabilizing the region, derailing ceasefire talks, and complicating Saudi-Israeli normalization efforts.
Conclusion
The overwhelming rejection underscores the fragility of Trump’s proposal, which clashes with decades of international consensus on Palestinian self-determination. While Israel’s government sees opportunity, global players —including key U.S. allies—view the plan as legally untenable and politically incendiary.
