The incoming Trump administration is poised to reverse significant progress made under the Biden administration regarding AI regulation. Trump plans to revoke Biden’s executive order aimed at ensuring the safe and trustworthy use of AI, which established guidelines for federal agencies and encouraged responsible development practices. Experts anticipate a shift towards a more laissez-faire approach, focusing on innovation and reducing regulatory barriers, potentially undermining commitments from AI companies to address risks like bias and discrimination. Trump’s selection of Andrew Ferguson for the FTC suggests further resistance to AI regulation, emphasizing a pro-innovation stance over regulatory oversight

repealing Biden’s AI executive order could have significant consequences, including:

• Loss of Safeguards: The order established important guidelines for federal agencies regarding AI use, particularly concerning bias and discrimination. Its repeal may lead to a lack of protections against harmful AI practices.

• Dissolution of Institutions: The U.S. AI Safety Institute, created under the order, could be dismantled, resulting in the loss of structured oversight and guidance for AI development and deployment.

• Increased Risks: Without regulatory frameworks, there is potential for unchecked AI applications that could threaten civil liberties, privacy, and national security, aligning the U.S. less favorably with international standards for ethical AI governance.

Repealing Biden’s AI executive order could significantly impact the development of AI in public services by:

• Reducing Oversight: A less stringent regulatory framework may lead to increased risks of bias and discrimination in AI applications, as protections against these issues could be weakened or eliminated.

• Shifting Focus: The emphasis might shift from ethical considerations and civil rights to prioritizing innovation and competition, particularly against China, potentially sidelining concerns about equitable AI deployment.

• Increased Discretion for Agencies: Federal agencies may gain more autonomy in AI implementation, which could lead to varied approaches across departments, potentially resulting in inconsistent standards and practices.

• Impact on Collaborative Initiatives: Programs like the AI Safety Institute and National AI Research Resource may face uncertainty or restructuring, affecting ongoing research and development efforts in public service applications.

The repeal of Biden’s AI executive order could significantly affect AI in education by:

• Increased Reliance on AI: Without regulatory guidelines, schools may over-rely on AI, potentially stifling critical thinking and interpersonal skills among students as they engage less with teachers and peers .

• Equity Gaps: The lack of oversight might exacerbate existing inequities, as not all students have equal access to technology, widening the achievement gap between socioeconomic groups .

• Quality of Education: Teachers may prioritize speed over quality in lesson planning, relying on AI-generated content without sufficient review, which could undermine educational effectiveness .

• Privacy Risks: The absence of strict regulations could lead to increased privacy and security concerns regarding student data collected by AI systems .

Overall, these changes could hinder the potential benefits of AI while amplifying its risks in educational settings.

The repeal of Biden’s AI executive order could significantly influence AI adoption in law enforcement by:

• Increased Bias Risks: Without regulatory oversight, AI tools may perpetuate or exacerbate existing biases, particularly in predictive policing, leading to disproportionate targeting of marginalized communities.

• Lack of Transparency: The absence of mandated transparency could hinder public trust, as citizens may not be informed about how AI technologies are used in policing and their implications for civil rights.

• Ethical Concerns: The repeal may diminish efforts to develop ethical AI frameworks, potentially resulting in unregulated use of AI technologies that do not prioritize fairness and accountability.

• Operational Efficiency vs. Accountability: While AI could enhance efficiency and resource allocation, the lack of safeguards might lead to misuse or over-reliance on technology without adequate human oversight, risking public safety and ethical standards.

AI is poised to significantly impact the role of teachers in the classroom by:

• Shifting from Knowledge Providers to Facilitators: Teachers will increasingly act as guides and mentors, focusing on fostering critical thinking and independent research as AI provides immediate access to information .

• Enhancing Personalized Learning: AI can tailor educational experiences to individual student needs, allowing teachers to concentrate on higher-order skills and differentiated instruction .

• Automating Administrative Tasks: By handling grading and feedback, AI can reduce teachers’ workloads, enabling them to dedicate more time to direct student interaction and personalized support .

• Creating Interactive Learning Environments: AI technologies like virtual reality can make lessons more engaging, allowing teachers to participate actively in immersive learning experiences .

• Data-Driven Insights: AI can analyze student performance data, helping teachers identify strengths and weaknesses, thus enabling targeted interventions .

Overall, while AI may change the dynamics of teaching, it is unlikely to replace the essential human elements of education.