Introduction

There are several main reasons behind the public outcry in France regarding Netanyahu’s arrest warrant:

Accusations of Double Standards

Human rights campaigners and activists have strongly criticized France’s stance, accusing the government of applying double standards in its approach to international justice. Critics point out the contradiction between France’s refusal to arrest Netanyahu and its previous actions against other individuals under similar warrants, such as Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir and Russia’s Vladimir Putin.

Undermining International Justice

Many argue that France’s position weakens its credibility on the global stage regarding international justice and the fight against impunity. Human rights organizations express concern that this stance could set a dangerous precedent for other leaders accused of war crimes.

Misinterpretation of International Law

Legal experts and human rights advocates argue that France is misrepresenting international law. They point out that under the ICC’s Rome Statute, immunity cannot be invoked for individuals facing arrest warrants, regardless of their position or their country’s membership in the court.

Perceived Political Motivations

Critics suggest that France’s position is politically motivated, potentially linked to its role in brokering the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire. Some view this as prioritizing diplomatic relations over international justice obligations.

Inconsistency with Previous Statements

France’s current stance appears to contradict its earlier strong support for the arrest warrant against Russian President Vladimir Putin, which has led to accusations of inconsistency in applying international law.

Conclusion

While there is no specific mention of public protests or demonstrations in France, the outcry is primarily voiced by human rights organizations, activists, and political analysts through official statements, social media platforms, and interviews with news outlets.