Is France confused or under political pressure?

Introduction

France appears to have shifted its stance regarding the International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrants issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Initially, France’s position was somewhat ambiguous, but recent statements from the French Foreign Ministry suggest a more definitive stance:

Initial Ambiguity

When first questioned about the arrest warrants, French officials were noncommittal. Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot stated that France is “deeply committed to international justice” and would “uphold international law,” but refrained from providing a direct answer about whether Netanyahu would be arrested if he entered France.

Clarified Position

The French Foreign Ministry has now strongly suggested that Netanyahu would not face immediate arrest if he were to enter French territory. This clarification represents a significant shift in France’s approach to the ICC warrants.

Key Points of France’s Current Stance

Immunity Consideration:

France argues that Netanyahu and other Israeli officials enjoy immunity under international law, as Israel is not a party to the ICC.

Continued Collaboration:

The French government has expressed its intention to maintain “close collaboration” with Netanyahu and other Israeli officials, emphasizing the longstanding friendship between France and Israel.

Legal Interpretation:

France cites Article 98 of the Rome Statute, which suggests that the ICC cannot require a state to act inconsistently with its obligations under international law regarding diplomatic immunity.

Balancing Act:

This position allows France to navigate its commitments to international justice while maintaining diplomatic relations with Israel, particularly in light of France’s role in brokering ceasefires in the Middle East.

Reactions and Implications

The shift in France’s position has drawn criticism from some quarters. Rights groups and opposition parties have suggested that France has tempered its response to maintain a working relationship with Netanyahu’s government. Some critics view this as prioritizing diplomatic relations over international justice obligations.

Conclusion

France has indeed changed its opinion about Netanyahu’s situation, moving from an ambiguous stance to a clearer position that effectively shields the Israeli Prime Minister from potential arrest based on the ICC warrants, citing diplomatic immunity considerations.

France needs to understand Israel may not be a signatory of ICC but UN has special provision for Palestine, where crime was committed. It’s is quite possible change in French stance towards Israel is political pressure from US.

Is France is not aware of this special provision.

Does it also mean France is opposing directive issued by EU commissioner to follow ICC orders.