Introduction

The immediate reactions from other Middle Eastern countries to the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hezbollah have been mixed, reflecting a range of perspectives on the implications for regional stability and ongoing conflicts, particularly in Gaza.

Key Reactions from Middle Eastern Countries

Lebanon:

The ceasefire has been met with relief among Lebanese citizens, many of whom began returning to their homes in southern Lebanon after the announcement. The Lebanese government officially endorsed the agreement, viewing it as a necessary step towards restoring stability in the region.

Egypt:

Egypt’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomed the ceasefire, seeing it as a potential catalyst for broader de-escalation in the region. Egypt has historically played a mediating role in conflicts involving Israel and Palestinian groups.

Jordan:

Jordan acknowledged the ceasefire as “an important step” but insisted that Israeli aggression against Gaza must also cease. This highlights Jordan’s concern about the humanitarian situation in Gaza and its implications for regional security.

Turkey:

Turkey expressed hope for a permanent ceasefire and called for international pressure on Israel to comply with the agreement’s terms. Turkish officials emphasized the need for compensation to Lebanon for damages incurred during the conflict.

Iran:

Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs welcomed the cessation of hostilities and reiterated its strong support for the Lebanese government and Hezbollah’s resistance against Israeli actions. This reaction underscores Iran’s role as a key ally of Hezbollah and its broader influence in regional conflicts.

Qatar:

Qatar voiced hope that the ceasefire could lead to a similar agreement to end the conflict in Gaza, reflecting its ongoing support for Palestinian causes and desire for stability in the region.

Hamas:

While not a state actor, Hamas declared its commitment to cooperating with any efforts aimed at achieving a ceasefire in Gaza, indicating that any future agreements must include provisions for ending hostilities in that territory as well.

Iraq:

Iraq called for urgent international action to halt Israeli actions in Gaza, emphasizing solidarity with Palestinian interests and concerns about ongoing violence.

Other Regional Responses:

Countries like Cyprus expressed support for Lebanon and highlighted the mediating roles of the U.S. and France. European leaders, including those from Germany and Italy, characterized the ceasefire as a beacon of hope for regional stability.

Conclusion

Overall, while many Middle Eastern countries reacted positively to the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, emphasizing its potential to foster stability, there remains significant concern regarding ongoing conflicts, particularly in Gaza. The reactions reflect a complex interplay of regional politics, with various nations advocating for broader resolutions that address not only the Israel-Hezbollah dynamic but also the humanitarian crises stemming from conflicts involving Hamas and other militant groups.