Introduction

A coup has occurred within the Jihad Council of Hezbollah, led by Hajj Khalil Harb, a prominent jihadist leader, and the commander of the Badr Force in Hezbollah.

This internal power shift appears to be significant given Harb’s extensive background and influence within the organization.

The main reason being Lebanese Hezbollah leader Sheikh Naim Qasem is seen as a weak leader than Hassan Nasrullah

Key Details of the Coup

Hajj Khalil Harb overthrowed the ceasefire agreement that was approved by Naim Qassem through military force under the slogan: 'We will not surrender; we either die or achieve victory.''

Leadership Role:

Hajj Khalil Harb has been a notable figure in Hezbollah’s military operations for decades. He was very close to Hassan Nasarullah too.

He previously commanded various units, including Unit 1800, which was responsible for operations against Israel and coordinating with Palestinian factions. His return to a leadership position suggests a strategic realignment within Hezbollah’s military hierarchy.

Objectives of the Coup:

The coup seems aimed at revitalizing Hezbollah’s operational capabilities, particularly in relation to its activities against Israel. Harb’s focus includes strengthening terror infrastructure and enhancing collaboration with local crime families in southern Lebanon to facilitate weapons and drug smuggling across the border into Israel.

Context of the Coup:

This internal shift may reflect dissatisfaction within Hezbollah regarding previous military strategies or performance, particularly following setbacks in establishing effective terror networks against Israel. Harb’s appointment is likely an attempt to leverage his experience and connections to reinvigorate these efforts.

Implications

The coup led by Harb could have significant implications for Hezbollah’s operational strategies and its overall effectiveness in regional conflicts.

His historical role in coordinating with Palestinian groups and his expertise in military operations position him as a critical player in shaping Hezbollah’s future actions against Israel. This development also highlights ongoing tensions within the organization as it navigates complex regional dynamics and its relationships with both local and international actors.

Conclusion

The internal coup signals a potential shift in Hezbollah’s approach to its military objectives and may lead to escalated tensions in the region as Harb seeks to implement his vision for the group’s future operations.