How have other countries with ICC membership responded to the US threats

The response from countries that are members of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to U.S. threats and sanctions against the court has been largely supportive of the ICC’s independence and its mandate to pursue justice. Here are some key reactions:

Support for ICC Independence

• Joint Statements by Member States: A significant number of ICC member states, specifically 93, have issued statements affirming their unwavering support for the court. They emphasized the importance of allowing the ICC to operate independently and without intimidation, asserting that it should carry out its duties in accordance with international law and the Rome Statute.

• European Union’s Position: The EU’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, stated that the ICC’s warrants are binding and should be honored by all member states, underscoring a commitment to uphold international legal obligations despite U.S. opposition.

• Individual Country Responses:

• The Netherlands: Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp confirmed that the Netherlands respects the autonomy of the ICC and will act in accordance with its arrest warrants.

• France: While not explicitly stating it would detain Netanyahu if he visited, France indicated it would adhere to ICC statutes, reflecting a cautious but supportive stance toward the court.

• Jordan: Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi emphasized the need for justice for Palestinians and respect for ICC decisions.

• Norway and Ireland: Both countries expressed confidence in the ICC fulfilling its mandate judiciously and recognized the significance of the warrants as steps toward accountability.

• South Africa’s Endorsement: The South African government welcomed the ICC’s actions as a notable advancement in justice for war crimes, reaffirming its commitment to international law and accountability.

Criticism of U.S. Actions

• Condemnation of Sanctions: Some member states have condemned U.S. sanctions against ICC officials as attempts to undermine judicial independence. The ICC itself has characterized these sanctions as unprecedented attacks on its operations and an infringement on international justice.

• Calls for Collective Action: Member states have called upon all countries to cooperate with the ICC and uphold their obligations under the Rome Statute, reinforcing a collective stance against external pressures from the U.S..

Conclusion

Overall, responses from ICC member countries indicate a strong commitment to supporting the court’s independence and authority in pursuing justice, despite U.S. threats and sanctions. This solidarity among member states highlights a broader recognition of the importance of international law and accountability mechanisms in addressing serious crimes globally.