Main reasons Saudi & UAE is not involved in Israel-Gaza conflict
Introduction
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Saudi Arabia have maintained a cautious stance regarding the Israel-Gaza conflict, opting for diplomatic engagement over direct involvement. Several factors contribute to this approach:
Diplomatic Relations and Normalization Efforts
Both nations have pursued normalization of relations with Israel in recent years. The UAE formalized ties through the Abraham Accords in 2020, and Saudi Arabia has engaged in discussions toward potential normalization. These diplomatic efforts aim to foster regional stability and economic cooperation. Direct involvement in the conflict could jeopardize these initiatives and strain emerging partnerships.
Humanitarian Concerns and Calls for Ceasefire
While refraining from military engagement, the UAE and Saudi Arabia have expressed deep concern over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Both countries have called for immediate ceasefires and emphasized the need for humanitarian aid. For instance, Saudi Arabia launched a government campaign to collect humanitarian aid for Gaza, gathering significant donations within hours.
Regional Stability and Economic Interests
The UAE and Saudi Arabia prioritize regional stability and economic development. Direct involvement in the conflict could lead to broader regional instability, adversely affecting their economic interests and ongoing reforms. By advocating for diplomatic solutions, they aim to mitigate the risk of escalation and maintain focus on their national development agendas.
Balancing International Relations
Both nations maintain strategic alliances with Western countries, particularly the United States. A neutral stance allows them to balance these relationships while addressing regional issues. Engaging in the conflict could complicate their foreign policy objectives and international partnerships.
Conclusion
UAE and Saudi Arabia’s decision to avoid direct involvement in the Israel-Gaza conflict stems from a desire to preserve diplomatic progress, address humanitarian concerns through non-military means, ensure regional stability, and maintain balanced international relations.
